 |
| Yong Hye-in, the head of the Basic Income Party, is discussing the budget for 2021 at a plenary session held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the afternoon of December 2 last year. On the 9th, Rep. Yong drew attention, refuting the criticism of basic income by former Blue House secretary Lim Jong-seok. © News1 |
Chosun-in Yong Hye-in (31), a member of the Basic Income Party, criticized Lim Jong-seok (55), a former president of the Blue House, a politician who said, “Politics is not something that happens in a close relationship with’brother-brother.
◇ Career splendor such as Yong Hye-in’first-choice and ultra-mini party lawmaker’ vs.
Rep. Yong is a member of the Basic Income Party, one member of the lawmaker, and is incomparable to Lim’s former head in terms of his political career and proportion of political circles.
Rep. Yong was elected as the 21st general election as the Dong-A-Democratic Party Proportional Satellite Party, and returned to the original party. The necessity and legitimacy of basic income has been constantly shouting, and in October of last year, “I will be a mother soon” and received many congratulations.
On the other hand, Lim Jeon was a former activist star in the 1980s and 1990s, who served as the chairman of the former university, and served as the 16th and 17th lawmakers and the president’s secretary. Jeon Lim is one of the candidates for the next presidential election in the passport.
◇ Yong Hye-in “If you thought your basic income was helping poor people, you would have made a mistake…”
On the 9th, on the 9th, on social media, Rep. Lee Jae-myung, Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myung, criticized Gyeonggi Governor’s claim of’basic income’, and criticized Jeon Lim.
First of all, Congressman Yong pointed out that “basic income is not a policy to help’poor and poor people’. If you approach it from the perspective of helping poor and poor people, basic income will feel like a’unjustified’ idea.”
This is because the previous day, Mr. Lim said, “How to spend limited resources is fairer without leaving pain for future generations, what is fairer in a world of polarization,” he said, focusing on resolving polarization rather than distributing little money to all the people. I was told that it was fairer and more just.
◇ Yong Hye-in “Basic income is not to pass the fence, but to remove the fence.”
In addition, Congressman Yong said, “Basic income is the right of a society to receive dividends for the common property inherited from nature or from previous generations, the’common wealth,'” said “Land, natural environment, natural resources, intellectual development of mankind, “It is to share the profits from these common areas such as big data fairly.”
In other words, “Basic income is not to let people with short’footrests’ (to cross the fence), but to say’let’s break down the fence’.” Therefore, “basic income is’fairness’ for the common wealth of society. And re-establishing’justice’,” he said.
◇ Basic income of 500,000 won is very short, but it doesn’t even start…
Furthermore, Rep. Yong said, “It takes about 317 trillion won to pay 500,000 won a month that Governor Jae-myeong Lee proposes as a mid- to long-term goal, and 500,000 won a month is still ridiculously insufficient for living expenses, but a huge increase in scale. He pointed out that it is necessary,” he said, and started to correct it.
Rep. Yong said, “The Basic Income Party proposed a model in which a basic income of 600,000 won per month is paid to all citizens, which is based on the’one-person household’s living benefit’ (54,8349 won in 2021).” It’s not a proper criticism that it’s a small amount, but you shouldn’t even start.
◇ Politics is not about’brother-brother’ relationship, but about drawing the future of the people and the country
Regarding the fact that Mr. Lim said, “It was also rejected in Switzerland (the national basic income referendum)”, “The contents of the 2016 referendum in Switzerland were not a vote asking whether to implement a basic income of 3 million won per month,” It was a vote on the amendment to the constitution asking whether the guarantee of basic income should be specified in the constitution,” he corrected.
Rep. Yong, who sharply refuted Lim’s claim, said, “The politician’s’attitude’ is important.” I think it should be drawing.”
This is because Lim’s former chief executive criticized Lee Nak-yeon, and Governor Lee Jae-myeong, wondering whether he was hitting him or not, according to his political intimacy.