“Chi-Min Yoo, ruling the future party” Kang-wook Choi’Channel A threats’ was fake

Kang-wook Choi, Representative of the Open Democratic Party (Former Secretary of Public Service, Blue House)[뉴시스]

Choi Kang-wook, the head of the Open Democratic Party, was prosecuted on the 26th for defaming the reputation of the Channel A reporter by disseminating false facts related to the ‘probate conflict.’

On the 26th, Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office Criminal Division (Director Pil-Geon Byun) indicted Choi for defamation by disseminating false facts in relation to reporter Lee Dong-jae on the 26th. It is said that the prosecution was prosecuted without a summons investigation against Choi.

On April 3, last year, CEO Choi posted on his FacebookLetters and Transcript Awards Channel A Reporter’s RemarksI posted a post titled’.

In this article, CEO Choi told the former Value Invest Korea (VIK) CEO Lee Chul, “It may not be true. Say that you gave money to the chairman of the Roh Moo Hyun-dan, Shi-min Yoo. Then that’s it“I wrote.”

“Then we do it ourselves. If you launch it on our broadcast (Channel A) as a scoop, the whole country will be flipped over. Ryu Si-min’s life ends“”President Moon’s approval ratings endlessly fall, and the next administration will be the future leader.Also wrote.

CEO Choi said at the end of the post, “What more do we need to say? General election planning by the prosecution and media, this is a coupInsisted.

However, in a letter sent by former reporter to former CEO Lee Chul, who is in prison, It turned out that there was no such content. During the prosecution’s investigation and trial, no evidence or testimony came out to prove Choi’s claim.

‘Channel A Reporter Transcript Summary’ posted on his Facebook by Kang-wook Choi, Proportional Representative of the Open Democratic Party.

Accordingly, the Legislative Solidarity (Law Refinement) to set up the rule of law accused CEO Choi, Hwang Hee-seok, former head of the Ministry of Justice’s Human Rights Bureau, and Mr. Jimo, who is called “Informer X,” for conspiracy to defamation and obstruction of business by spreading false information. At the time, Beop Se-ryun argued that “CEO Choi’s social network service (SNS) article, filled with manipulation and fabrication, was a political maneuver that attempted to manipulate public opinion, and was a heinous personality murder that caused an indelible wound to the former reporter.”

However, the prosecutors’ prosecution has filed an unprosecution against former director Hwang and Mr. Ji. It was judged that it was difficult to see that these three people conspired to write Choi’s SNS posts.

Regarding this, a high-ranking prosecution official said, “This is a result that shows that the nature of the’conflict of authority’ was not’convergence of prosecution’. As the Seoul Central District Attorney General Lee Seong-yoon approved this case, he was not charged with prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, both sides of the coin. There was a greater reason to make a decision. If not, avoiding responsibility”

Reporters Sumin Kim and Yujin Jung [email protected]