Justice Minister Park Beom-gye (left) and Im Eun-jeong, Supreme Prosecutors’ Office of Policy Studies (Deputy Prosecutor). yunhap news
Justice Minister Park Beom-gye said on the 24th that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of Policy Research (Deputy Prosecutor) Im Eun-jeong posted the contents of the internal meeting on the Social Network Service (SNS) and raised controversy. “It would be great,” he said, “I would like to express your interest and request as a minister (in my thoughts) that it may be helpful in carrying out my inspection work.
Minister Park said, “It is within the range of freedom of expression as prosecutors post their opinions on the internal network of the prosecutors’ office.” “I think there is a difference in confidentiality between notifying a specific media and raising an opinion by the Chief Prosecutor Lim,” he said.
He also raised, saying, “In the case of the suspicion of mother harm perjury, the teacher was almost entirely alone,” he said.
When Prosecutor Lim reported on his Facebook page on the 4th that he would criminally prosecute an inmate in the prosecution’s case regarding the suspicion of perjury in the case of Han Myung-sook, former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol designated the third prosecutor as the chief prosecutor. It has been claimed to have been excluded from work. For this reason, it was pointed out in the legal community that it was inappropriate for the Prosecutor Lim to participate in the joint inspection of the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, and civic groups also accused him of leaking secrets for public service.
“The next Prosecutor General, quite a few people have been recommended.”
Regarding the promotion of joint prosecution at the Ministry of Justice and Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Minister Park said, “The center of gravity of the joint prosecution is in the Ministry of Justice, and not only Lim, but all prosecutors belonging to the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office will participate, so you don’t have to worry about objectivity.” I wish I could proceed independently as much as possible.” In addition, he said, “I will leave the prosecution period, method, and subject entirely to the prosecutor.”
Regarding the assertion of’disclosing the transcripts of the Great Sword Chief and High Sword Chiefs Meeting,’ he said, “It’s a matter to be judged entirely by the great swordsman,” but he said, “Just because the transcripts are released, the post-war will not change significantly.”
In addition, he added, “There are quite a few people recommended,” he added, saying, “I’m very interested, so I’ll watch it very carefully, because I’m very interested.”
Reporter Go Seok-hyun [email protected]
