Suwon “It is meaningless to contact Jeonbuk after transfer negotiations”
[대한축구협회 제공. 재판매 및 DB 금지]
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Bo-in Jang = Suwon Samsung and Pro Football K League 1 Suwon Samsung and Baek Seung-ho (24, Jeonbuk Hyundai) disputed some of Suwon’s positions and appealed to “Stop reckless slander” did.
On the 2nd, Baek Seung-ho’s agency, Brion Company, issued a statement and said, “I sincerely apologize to the Suwon club and K-League fans for creating a noisy situation regarding the transfer of the K-League team.” In order to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings, I have refrained from communicating with the media, but I am seriously concerned about the current situation leading to malicious public opinion against players, personal attacks, and even local demeanor. The relationship is revealed.”
Baek Seung-ho, who studied abroad in FC Barcelona (Spain) with the support of the club while attending Maetanjung, a youth team at Suwon Samsung in 2010, is known to have written an agreement promising to join Suwon when he returns to the K-League. However, it was controversial as it pursued a contract with Jeonbuk without implementing this.
Jeonbuk announced that it would suspend the recruitment process after learning the contents of the agreement, but officially announced the recruitment of Baek Seung-ho one day ahead of the K-League transfer market deadline (March 31), as Suwon and Baek Seung-ho were unable to resolve the entangled problem.
Currently, Suwon has announced a legal response, saying, “Baek Seung-ho side has violated the agreement, such as pursuing a transfer to another club without consulting with the club.”
Baek Seung-ho first explained, “The player completely excluded the Suwon club and did not prepare to transfer to the K-League.”
In February of this year, after a domestic media report stating that’Jeonbuk is showing interest in recruiting Baek Seung-ho’, Suwon did not contact Suwon, but rather asked for communication, but Suwon did not respond.
Baek Seung-ho said, “After a single article on the possibility of a legal dispute between the player and Suwon was published, we contacted Suwon’s player management manager and club officials on February 19 and 20 to resolve the misunderstanding, but did not receive it. On the 21st, the previous agreement was written. I talked about 40 minutes with the person in charge who was involved, but I did not receive any contact from the person in charge of the player management.”
In addition, in a series of processes, Suwon insisted that he had never announced his intention to recruit a player.
In the statement, Seung-ho Baek said, “As it is known through the media, Suwon club executives called the Jeonbuk club executives in mid-February and said’There is no room for recruitment’.”
“Suwon sent an inquiry e-mail to the player’s former team, Darmstadt (Germany), as well as the player’s current status.” It is possible,” he added, and requested that the full transfer conditions be presented by March 5, but since Suwon did not respond, the consultation did not proceed further.”
However, the Suwon club is in the opposite position.
An official from Suwon said, “Suwon was the first person to contact me on February 5 after seeing the transfer to Jeollabuk-do. It was said that the other party contacted me on the 8th, but at the time, the club staff did not know that Baek Seung-ho was on the side and did not receive it.” The transfer negotiations with Jeollabuk-do had been completed to some extent before February 19. Isn’t there any meaning of agreement to contact us after that.”
“It is also not true that Suwon called Jeonbuk and said that he could not afford to recruit,” he said. “I sent an official letter to Darmstadt to request information necessary for the recruitment, but the transfer conditions were not heard from our request. “I gave a one-sided answer to present it.”
[전북 현대 인스타그램 캡처. 재판매 및 DB 금지]
Meanwhile, Baek Seung-ho’s side raised doubts about the second agreement, which contained the content of’Join Suwon when returning to the K-League’.
Baek Seung-ho said, “We do not deny the agreement altogether,” said, “The contents of the 2nd agreement to the Suwon club’when players must return regardless of everything’ include clues that’when no transfer fee is incurred’ and’when Suwon wants it’ I want to ask if it works.”
“Suwon said that despite repeated apologies, he took the time until the player registration deadline was imminent, and forced him to return to Germany by forcing only a’sincerity apology.’ This misleading situation violates the rights of players and freedom of career choice. Act”.
Pointing out that the K-League youth rules did not exist when Baek Seung-ho left to study abroad, he said, “I am feeling serious concern about morally shaving down individual players with a huge frame that says, “It is shaking the foundation of K-League youth”. “I will make an official inquiry to the International Football Federation (FIFA).”
In addition, “The amount that Suwon claimed as’damage compensation’ (1.42 billion won) is too much to say that it offered a compromise. Whether Suwon had a willingness to agree, and Suwon’s assertion of the’youth system’, the player who has grown up under the’youth system’ that Suwon claims is truly an amount. I doubt whether you are caring for it.”
Baek Seung-ho finally said, “I hope this problem will not be expanded to court battles and will be resolved smoothly,” and “Please stop reckless slander. We will respond strongly to the defamation of players due to false facts.” .
Unauthorized reproduction-redistribution prohibited>
2021/04/02 18:42 sent