Apink’s Park Cho-rong accused of being accused of being innocent, “Apologize”

[이데일리 정시내 기자] Mr. A, who claimed to have suffered school violence (hereinafter referred to as abusing) from group A Pink member Park Cho-rong, sued Park Cho-rong on charges of innocence. On the 5th, Mr. A filed a complaint with the Gangnam Police Station in Seoul, Sports Trend reported.

Mr. A said, “I will (response) so that I can reveal the facts until the end by saying that Park Cho-rong will not apologize for the school abuse and will take legal action.” “After the facts of Hakpok were disclosed, there are secondary abuses such as bad comments. We will respond hardly to malicious comments,” he emphasized.

Apink member Park Chorong. Photo = E-Daily DB

In 2008, when he was 18 years old, A accidentally encountered Park Cho-rong on a street in Sachang-dong, Seowon-gu, Cheongju. Afterwards, she laughed a bit, but claimed that she was taken to the alley by Park Cho-rong’s friends and assaulted because she said, “Laughing at me was unpleasant.” It was reported that the trauma remains until now, after 10 years due to the shame and shock caused by the school bombing, which is disrupting daily life. Also, in the first call with Park Cho-rong, Mr. A claimed that Park Cho-rong remembered the incident and apologized, but later reversed his apology. It also said that there are transcripts that can prove this.

Mr. A said, “I have a recorded file of what Park Chorong apologized, and if he refuses to apologize until the end, we will disclose it.”

Prior to the disclosure of Mr. A, Park Cho-rong’s agency, PlayM Entertainment, said on the 1st, “Through a law firm, a criminal complaint against Mr. A was first filed with the Gangnam Police Station for defamation and attempted coercion in case of false facts related to the artist Apink Park Cho-Rong. I did it.”

The agency said, “Mr. A recently threatened to expose untrue assault and private life to the media and urged the entertainment industry to retire.” The relationship was corrected, and I tried to communicate by responding to Mr. A’s request for meeting and opening the conversation.”

He also said, “It is a clear scratch, and we will hold legal responsibility for this matter strictly based on the evidence.”

.Source