Ahead of the enactment of the’Courier Delivery Act’… Chaebol couriers who changed the word “I never agreed”



On the morning of the morning of the 6th, officials from the Courier Countermeasure Committee for Overworked Delivery Workers are holding a press conference to condemn the courier for the breach of the Social Consensus Organization Agreement in Jongno-gu, Seoul.

On the morning of the morning of the 6th, officials from the Courier Countermeasure Committee for Overworked Delivery Workers are holding a press conference to condemn the courier for the breach of the Social Consensus Organization Agreement in Jongno-gu, Seoul.ⒸNews 1

It is controversial that chaebol couriers have unilaterally destroyed the contents discussed by the social consensus body regarding the’classification work’ that was pointed out as the cause of the subsequent overwork of courier workers. It was agreed in advance to include the contents of the classification process in the standard contract instead of stipulating it in the law, but the courier company decided not to accept it late. On the other hand, the courier company insisted that “there is no agreement.”

The courier worker overworked countermeasure committee (Overworked Overworked Committee) held a press conference at 11 am on the 6th at the Participation Solidarity in Jongno-gu, Seoul, and said, “At the first meeting of the Social Consensus Organization, a discussion on sorting work was conducted. done. However, the Integrated Logistics Council, which attended on behalf of the delivery company, unilaterally canceled the agreement at the second meeting on December 29th last year, saying that it could not accept the contents of the sorting agreement agreed at the first meeting.”

According to the Overworked Deaths Countermeasure Committee, discussions on’classification work’ were held at the first meeting of the social consensus organization held on the 15th of last month, and as a result, they agreed to clarify the classification work.


Results of the 1st meeting of the Social Consensus Organization

Results of the 1st meeting of the Social Consensus OrganizationⒸProvided by the Overworked Death Countermeasure Committee

For the details of the’clarification of classification work’ agreed on this day, ▲The classification service is reported as the business of the business operator regardless of the term or hub and subterminal division, and the sub-terminal classification service is clearly divided into specific tasks (many courier to own courier service). Selection of the courier service also corresponds to the classification work) ▲The courier service operator’s basic work is collection and delivery, and according to the site conditions, the courier driver pays the classification price when performing the classification work, and specifies it in the standard contract ▲Resolves the recruitment difficulties for the classification work Whether foreign workers are allowed to be input for sorting work or not, try recruiting as much as possible through improvement of sorting work or compensation, and consider allowing foreign workers to be input at a supplementary level. ▲The government secured a parcel terminal site and supported the establishment of automated sorting facilities.

The Overworked Deaths Countermeasure Committee said, “(Couriers) did not recognize the term “classification” and insisted that it was only an extension of the delivery work. He also denied the fact that the sorting work is the business of the business operator,” he pointed out, “It is a trick to pass on the sorting work to the courier workers even though the people have promised to put the sorting work in front of the public.”

Jin Gyeong-ho, executive chairman of the Overworked Workers’ Countermeasure Committee, said, “The’clarification of courier classification work’, which was originally intended to be included in the Living Logistics Service Act (Living Logistics Act), was negotiated within the social consensus organization and was supposed to be included in the standard contract.” When the law passed the subcommittee of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the couriers who attended the second meeting held on the 29th of last month as if waiting for the bill, criticized that they could not accept the existing agreement.”

The Living Logistics Act, which passed the subcommittee of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on the 24th of last month, is just ahead of the passage of the National Assembly plenary session on the 8th. As the Living Logistics Act does not contain a clear concept of sorting work, if it is not possible to reach an agreement within the social consensus organization, it is highly likely that the sorting work that was pointed out as the cause of overwork of the courier worker will return to the parcel driver’s share again. .

Executive Chairman Jin said, “If the Living Logistics Act is passed and the classification work is not included in the standard contract, in the end, the Living Logistics Act will become a law that gives only preferential treatment to the conglomerates.” Not much. Rather, about 90% of them lamented that the government allowed conglomerates to provide terminal land to conglomerates using idle land.”

He said, “If the discussion on the sorting work is not properly conducted at the 3rd Social Consensus Organization working meeting scheduled for the coming 12th, the situation where the courier workers are overworked will continue again.” He warned, “We have no choice but to take special measures to recognize that it is a desperate situation.”

In response to the criticism, CJ Logistics explained through a press release that “I know that the Korea Integrated Logistics Association, which participated in the agreement, was in the position that there was no agreement.”


Jin Gyeong-ho, chairman of the Executive Committee for the Countermeasures against Overworked Delivery Workers, makes a remark at a press conference on the morning of the 6th to condemn the delivery company for the breach of the social agreement organization agreement held at the Participation Solidarity in Jongno-gu, Seoul.

Jin Gyeong-ho, chairman of the Executive Committee for the Countermeasures against Overworked Delivery Workers, makes a remark at a press conference on the morning of the 6th to condemn the delivery company for the breach of the social agreement organization agreement held at the Participation Solidarity in Jongno-gu, Seoul.ⒸNews 1

“CJ Logistics has 2,000 classified personnel? Everything is a scam”…
Hanjin courier worker promises’no late-night delivery’ delivery completion message at 6 am

The Overworked Deaths Countermeasures Committee also criticized that the support measures announced by couriers in October last year were not being properly followed.

The Overworked Deaths Countermeasure Committee said, “CJ Logistics announced that 2,259 people have been employed, but 700 of them are those who have been putting in for the second round of delivery since before the countermeasures against overworked deaths.” have. CJ argues that it is as if they have spent money and hired a new manpower and put in a sorting manpower, which is a scam.”

He added, “Lotte and Hanjin Express promised to put in 1,000 people for sorting work, but it is virtually no different from the current state.”

It also pointed out that Hanjin Express, which promised to’ban late-night delivery’, was not implementing this. Recently, the Overworked Death Countermeasure Committee, which explained that a Hanjin courier worker collapsed due to a brain hemorrhage while delivering it until dawn, disclosed the details of Kim’s cell phone text message as evidence. On Kim’s mobile phone, a text message saying’I’m going after courier delivery’ was left with the customer number at 4:51, 5:18, and 6 am.

Executive Chairman Jin said, “Kim’s family requested the record of Mr. Kim’s usual work to Hanjin Express for the request for industrial accidents, but was rejected.” “Probably, Mr. Kim had the delivery taken before 10 p.m. and the actual delivery was made until dawn. It was because I was concerned that it would be revealed.

He said, “It clearly shows that all the support measures announced by the courier were deceptive.”

Meanwhile, in response to the claim, CJ Logistics said, “The manpower input for the second round of delivery claimed by the countermeasure committee was 55.3% of the total number of personnel. Expenses paid to them since November have been settled later in accordance with the consultation with the company and the delivery store, he argued. “It is also a case of distortion of the site situation that the countermeasure committee calls them’manpower for two-round delivery’.”


Reporter Yoon Jeong-heon

Please support the reporter

Did you read the article well? The reader’s little support is a great help to the reporter. All of your donations will go to reporters.

Source