Ahead of the conclusion of the suspension of execution…

Dong-Hoon Han Prosecutor [연합뉴스]

It was concluded that the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office should deal with prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, who is suspected of being involved in the Channel A case, without charges. However, the final approval remains at the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Lee Seong-yoon.

One of the reasons for the disciplinary action against the incumbent prosecutor general in the history of the constitution, the so-called’prosecutor’s office’ was concluded in half. This leads to suspicion that’Prosecutor Lee deliberately crushes the case.’

According to the JoongAng Ilbo’s coverage on the 24th, the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office (Director Pil-Geon Byun) recently submitted an opinion to the Prosecutor of the District Prosecutors’ Office that it would conclude an innocent conclusion against a prosecutor. This is because there is no evidence to prove the allegations, and it has already been more than nine months since the investigation began.

However, it is said that the District Prosecutor’s Office has not issued an approval until this day. Accordingly, there are criticisms from the inside of the prosecution, “It is impossible to crush major cases that need to be dealt with urgently” and “Are you conscious of the suspension of the execution of the prosecutor general Yoon Seok-yeol?” On that day, the court held a second interrogation and concluded on the case of President Yoon’s two-month suspension of execution.

One prosecution officer said, “If one of the reasons for the disciplinary action of the Prosecutor General Yoon was concluded, it was revealed that the’inspection and obstruction of the Channel A case’, which was one of the reasons for the disciplinary action of the Prosecutor General, was unreasonable. It will only be left,” he criticized.

Lee Seong-yoon, Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office [중앙포토]

The’Channel A incident’ (so-called’verbion collusion’) was raised by MBC’s report based on the report of informant X Jimo (55). The main point was that while this reporter was covering the allegations of Shillazen, he used his acquaintance with a high-ranking prosecutor to report to the former representative, “Report the allegations of corruption by the chairman of the Roh Moo Hyun-dan, Yoo Si-min.”

At the same time, a suspicion of’conflicting rights’ was also raised. It is said that Ji, who is the informant, formed a trap by making contact with MBC in advance with pro-mooners. However, a report was made saying that the investigation of’conflict of powers’ was not supported even within the investigation team.

Suspicion of ‘peacock’ both inside and outside had a big wave. Prosecutor Han was relegated as a research fellow at the Legal Affairs and Training Institute and was directly subject to inspection.

There was even a deformed form of the minister’s command of the investigation, saying,’Make the president’s hand off’ in the investigation of the case. This is because of the criticism of President Yoon’s’covering the family’, with a passport as the heading.

Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol greets prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, deputy prosecutor at Busan High School. A deputy prosecutor, who was classified as a close friend of General Yoon, was relocated to the Busan High Prosecutor’s Office while conducting the investigation of corruption in the family of former Justice Minister Cho Kook when he was the anti-corruption chief of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office. [연합뉴스]

General Yoon and Prosecutor Han have been working together since the days of the Great Swordsman’s Department of the Middle East, and they also worked together in the investigation of the Gukjeong Nongdan. When Yoon was the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, he was at the forefront of the Moon Jae-in administration’s investigation of the settlement of red abolition by investigating’Judongnongdan’. After Yoon became the head of the prosecutor’s office, he was promoted to the chief prosecutor’s chief anti-corruption force, and led the investigation into the family of former Justice Minister Cho Kook.

These are some of the first reasons for disciplining the incumbent prosecutor general. Among the reasons for the two-month suspension of President Yoon announced by the disciplinary committee, ▶ interfering with the inspection of the Channel A case ▶ interfering with the investigation of the Channel A case. The court concludes on the case of the application for suspension of execution for two months of suspension, which will gauge Yun’s return, as of this day.

Reporters Kim Soo-min and Jung Yu-jin [email protected]