[스포츠서울 박효실기자] Singer IU recently and was gathered comfortably ppaedam the image is the topic of a public gotta look ‘fake dip “technique, recent flooding and composite video artists use them, but enforcement and penalties has been found to be insufficient.
KBS’News 9’reported on the 6th that the Deep Fake Penalty Act was created last year as a crime of’deep fake’ that synthesizes the body of another person on the face of a specific person, but the actual prosecution was only 10%.
Deepfake refers to a video compilation that synthesizes an existing face or specific part by deep learning a high-definition video. With the development of technology, more sophisticated composites have appeared and are being used in crime.
In the report that day, when a reporter entered a specific word in the Internet search box, naked photos of celebrities poured out. All were made using deepfake technology. There were many cases where fake subtitles were applied as if a celebrity said obscene words. Transaction prices such as ‘5,000 won on 20 sheets’ were also written.
KBS said, “The so-called’Deep Fake Penalty Act’, which punishes false video clips, has been in force since June of last year. However, only two of the 45 suspected’deep fake’ crime suspects who were investigated after the enforcement of the law were prosecuted to be arrested. It was confirmed that he was prosecuted,” he reported.
The prosecution rate for deepfake crimes is at the level of 10%, which is noticeably low compared to the prosecution rate for illegal shooting suspects close to 40%. As it is a new type of crime, it seems that it is a confusing situation when the police or prosecutors who judge whether or not to commit a crime decide the crime.
The reason for the low prosecution rate, KBS reported, “The Supreme Prosecutors Office explained that it was because there were many cases where it was difficult to identify the suspects in crimes that took place in cyberspace, and the prosecution was suspended or transferred to other institutions.”
Photo Source|KBS