[정치]”MB NIS temple suspicion” nervous war… Will Pandora’s box open?

[앵커]

“The Lee Myung-bak government’s National Intelligence Service inspected all 18 members of the National Assembly.”

On the 8th, a media report struck the political world, citing the words of a high-ranking NIS official.

This is because it contains the contents that the National Intelligence Service made and still keeps the personal information documents of 299 members of the 18th National Assembly.

The main argument in the article is that the Blue House of the Lee Myung-bak administration was involved in this process.

Right now, the Democratic Party defined the allegations as’crimes’.

It is said that a power agency illegally inspected the trends of a thousand people, including all 18 lawmakers, lawmakers, journalists, and entertainers.

It also emphasizes the need to investigate the truth and raises the level of the offensive.

On the other hand, the power of the people is questioning the’time point’ at which the suspicion was raised.

It is said that a matter of twelve years ago reignited ahead of the re-election in April, and the political intentions are questioned.

In this way, there is a clear difference between the opposition parties.

The nervous war over Pandora’s box from the NIS is expected to continue for the time being.

Then we will connect with the National Assembly and find out more details.

The National Assembly Information Committee receives business reports from the NIS in the morning and afternoon.

In particular, inquiries are focused on whether the National Intelligence Service inspected lawmakers and people of various fields illegally during the Lee Myung-bak administration.

The Democratic Party has tried to find out the truth, saying that the inspectors are a serious crime, but they are protesting that the power of the people is a political offensive ahead of the election.

Connect with reporters who are in the National Assembly. Reporter Choi Ah-young!

The NIS job report is getting longer than expected. What was the main discussion in the morning?

[기자]

The NIS work report continued from 10 am was temporarily suspended.

It will reopen privately at 2:30pm in a few moments.

In the morning meeting, inquiries were concentrated on whether the NIS during the Lee Myung-bak administration had illegal inspections of not only 299 members of the 18th National Assembly, but also people from various fields.

First of all, the Democratic Party is focusing on confirming the substance of the temple documents and their contents.

First of all, it was reported that the NIS did not submit a list of documents related to illegal inspections requested by Democratic Party members.

Accordingly, the Democratic Party is planning to request the release of data through a resolution at the level of the information committee.

The National Intelligence Service can request a report from the National Intelligence Service on a specific matter with more than two-thirds of the current members of the National Intelligence Service, and 8 out of 12 members of the Intelligence Committee can vote independently as members of the Democratic Party.

However, since it is in conflict with the Personal Information Protection Act, we are also looking into ways to obtain documents by requesting information disclosure directly after receiving only a list of documents.

On the other hand, the people’s strength is saying that it is very regrettable that the ruling party has launched a low-level political offensive about 50 days before the by-election.

At the same time, the Democratic Party criticized former Minister of Environment Kim Eun-kyung’s being silent for being sentenced to medium sentence as a’blacklist’.

Chung Jin-seok, a member of the People’s Strength, who served as the head of government at the Blue House during the Lee Myung-bak administration, also claimed that a document that was not revealed even in the liquidation of the redemption appeared just before the election, and was offensive for election.

[앵커]

Along with this, the fiscal authorities’ work report is in progress, and you are creaking again with the Democratic Party over the Corona 19 loss compensation system?

[기자]

The Party and the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, which had been in conflict with the 4th disaster support fund, are disagreeing over the loss compensation system this time.

The party and the government have different opinions over which law to put the loss compensation system.

First of all, the Democratic Party is pursuing a revision of the law that includes the grounds for compensation for losses in the Infectious Disease Prevention Act.

However, the Ministry of Equipment and Welfare are showing a hard time.

Earlier, the Ministry of Information and Communication stated that the infectious disease prevention method mainly stipulates the direct loss of medical institutions, but it is necessary to carefully review the specificity of the damage to the business of small business owners.

In addition, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, a department under the Infectious Disease Prevention Act, is in the same position as the Ministry of Information, saying that it has little relevance to the business of self-employed and small business owners.

Therefore, there is an opinion that it is difficult to limit the scope of compensation to only small business owners because the association with infectious diseases, which is the cause of compensation, is low, although a plan to include a loss compensation system in the Small Business Owner Protection Act is also being reviewed.

So, we are also looking into ways to enact a new law for compensation for losses.

In response, Hong Nam-ki, deputy prime minister of the economy, said in his work report that he agreed to institutionalize compensation for losses.

However, there is no case of creating a law for compensation for losses, and it is necessary to find out whether it is compensation for losses or government support for damages, and said that the relevant ministries will conclude the review as soon as possible and consult with the National Assembly.

So far, the National Assembly has delivered it.

Ayoung Choi [[email protected]]