[서울신문] Park Hye-soo, “Expanding the range of complaints” on suspicion of bloody assault[전문]

Indefinitely acting on the drama’Dear M’

Actor Park Hye-soo said it would refute allegations of school violence and expand the scope of the complaint. The drama’Dear M’starring Park Hye-soo was postponed indefinitely.

On the 4th, Park Hye-soo’s agency insisted that “Park Hye-soo’s allegations of school violence are obviously false.”

The agency was beaten by Park Hye-soo several times to become bloody, and related to the claim of Mr. B, the main disclosure claimant that he heard his father’s curse, “A number of text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the time of the assault claimed by Mr. Nothing can be inferred. It is common sense that Mr. B, the victim, sends a text message to Park Hye-soo, the target of fear that he assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody many times or participated in the assault, and he even called his father to swear words. It’s hard to understand even if it is,” he refuted.

The agency said, “We have already filed a complaint against major people who posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. In order to justify the false disclosure, we plan to expand the scope of the complaint against others who are claiming false information again.” “We will hold strict legal responsibility for the false disclosure. In addition, I would like to ask once again to refrain from reckless speculation and slander without a reasonable basis.”

The first broadcast of the KBS2TV drama’Dear M’is also being postponed indefinitely. The number of petitions for postponing’Dearm’ broadcast on the KBS Viewers Rights Center’s petition bulletin board exceeded 2800 on that day, and the production crew closed the’Dearm’ viewer bulletin board.

The following is the full text of Park Hye-soo’s agency position.Hi. Studio Santa Claus. I would like to convey the official position of actor Park Hye-soo reported in the media.

1) Currently, the arguments of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s school violence are obviously false. Their arguments do not correspond with objective evidence, and even contradict their words and actions in the past. As such, as long as the allegations of school violence allegations are false, the statements of those involved in conforming these false claims are also false.

2) We disclose our position on the allegation of Mr. B, the main claimant of disclosure.

A) Mr. B claims that he was violated by Park Hye-soo in school and assaulted to become bloody several times while making the allegation of the damage, and that Mr. Park Hye-soo called Mr. B’s father and made swear words.

However, in the many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the point of the assault that Mr. B claims, there is no content that can infer the fact of the assault at all.

Rather, Mr. B even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying, “Don’t chew Hye-soo,” when Park Hye-soo did not respond to her contact.

It is common for the victim, B, to send a text message, “Don’t chew,” to Park Hye-soo, the target of horror to the extent that he assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody or participated in the assault several times and even called his father to swear words It’s hard to understand even from common sense.

B) Mr. B said through media interviews on March 4, 2021, “The time of the assault was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of junior high school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of junior high school) ) It’s a picture.”

However, the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the content of Mr. B’s interview with the media is false.

C) Also, as can be seen from the previously reported article and witness testimony, Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and there is no shopping mall where the second assault was carried out. These facts are clearly consistent with the testimony of witnesses who were present at the time.

In the light of the reported articles and statements made by related witnesses, it can be seen that Park Hye-soo has never been involved in any of the first and second incidents. Unlike the alleged content, the 3rd incident’playground’ can be confirmed that the person who violated the violence was not Mr. Park Hye-soo, but the third person. This is clearly stated in the 3/4 interview that the victim of the assault was mentioned and that he was.

D) In ​​addition, Mr. B is constantly changing his claims based on the facts revealed through media reports, so the credibility of the claim is doubted.

In fact, the first claim for damage was that he was beaten by Park Hye-soo (2/22 SNS claim), but later,’group assault’ and’assault key’ (2/24 SNS/interview). Has been changed. Then, currently, Park Hye-soo continues to change the argument as the cause of the assault (3/4 interview).

3) The company has already filed a complaint against the major people who posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. In addition, various evidences, including evidence reported in the media, have been submitted to the investigative agency, and additional evidence that is being secured will also be submitted to the investigative agency.

In addition, we plan to expand the scope of complaints against others who are alleging false facts again to justify false disclosures.

4) We will hold strict legal liability for false disclosures. In addition, we ask again to refrain from indiscriminate speculation and slander without a reasonable basis. Thank you.

Reporter Kim Yoo-min [email protected]