[사회]The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office reports to the Ministry of Justice, making the final decision of acquitting the suspicion of perjury to the inmate

[앵커]

Prosecutor General Cho Nam-gwan, acting as an acting prosecutor, has finally decided to dismiss allegations of perjury in the case of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook.

Acting Cho reported the decision to the Ministry of Justice yesterday.

Connect with reporters. Reporter Han Dong-oh!

Actress Cho retained the conclusions of the Chief Swordsman’s meeting?

[기자]

Yes, it is.

Yesterday, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Meeting re-deliberated on the suspicion of perjury of the inmate in the case of the illegal political money receipt of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook and concluded that he was not charged.

Nam-gwan Cho, acting as the acting president, decided to keep the dismissal for the purpose of no charge, and reported it to the Ministry of Justice yesterday.

Based on the results of the director’s meeting, it was the final decision not to hand over the suspicion of perjury to the inmate.

This decision was made two days before the expiration of the statute of limitations for this case, which is midnight tomorrow.

As a result, the investigation or investigation of the alleged perjury of the inmate in relation to the former Prime Minister Han’s case has virtually ended.

However, even with the conclusion of the great sword’s innocence, there are mixed reactions.

First of all, criticism was raised that it was unreasonable for Justice Minister Park Beom-gye to exercise the power of investigative command to judge again despite the conclusion of the great sword’s innocence.

Attorney Kim Jong-min, a former prosecutor, criticized the invocation of the investigation, saying it was an irrational number of political intentions to highlight that there was a problem with former President Yoon Suk-yeol’s decision.

On the other hand, there is a view that the prosecution has concluded to cover the entire family despite unreasonable investigations such as the disclosure of the person involved in the case and the investigation of the campaign without leaving a record.

Attorney Shinshin-sik, the legal representative of the inmate’s legal representative who exposed the alleged perjury, criticized the prosecution’s convictions and threats as obvious, but the reason the chief prosecutors and chief prosecutors were not accused was because so much was at stake in this case.

Im Eun-jeong, the prosecution policy researcher, who was in charge of the prosecution investigation in this case, said that he would bravely prepare for tomorrow, saying that he was grateful that he was not unanimous with the result of the vice-president of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Meeting, which decided to unprodict.

In the midst of this, the possibility of a joint prosecution on the investigation of the former Prime Minister Park’s order is emerging as a new variable in the conflict between the Ministry of Justice and the prosecution.

As the prosecution chief Han Dong-soo and researcher Im Eun-jeong, who insisted on the prosecution in this case, become the subject of the joint prosecution, there is a prospect that controversy over the fairness of the prosecution and the prosecution’s investigation practices may rise again.

YTN Han Dong-oh at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office[[email protected]]is.

※’Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]