[사회][앵커리포트] Braking the abolition of our own highs?…”Reverse normalization” vs.

[고진영 / 배재고 교장 : 자사고, 외고, 특목고 등 3개의 변호인단이 각각 헌법소원을 제기해서 진행하고 있는데 이 헌법소원을 통해서 2025년도의 시행령 폐지를 통해서 자사고를 폐지하겠다는 내용도 철회되리라고 믿어 의심치 않습니다.]

[조희연 / 서울시 교육감 : 과도한 사교육비를 줄이고 고교 공교육을 정상화하고자 하는 교육 개혁에 역행하는 판결이라고 생각합니다. 즉각 항소하고자 합니다.]

Following Busan, the court judged that the cancellation of the designation of autonomous private high schools was unjust in Seoul.

We examine the reasons for judgment, controversies, and prospects.

The judge saw that’retroactive application’ was a problem.

In the process of re-designation of own high school, the acceptance cut line and the factor of deduction were changed after four months, and the last five years were retroactively applied based on the changed criteria.

Actually, the canceled Bae Inventory and Sehwa High scores were 65 and 67.5 points, respectively.

Autonomous private high schools were created in 2010, and there are 38 in the country.

It was intended to complement the uniformity of high school leveling and gave more discretion than that of general high schools, but criticism continued for failing to perform its function.

It was said that it was about encouraging the’slumization’ of general high schools, which turned into a’college school’ while sweeping students with good grades.

There has also been controversy that private education is essential for admission to a private high school, and money ultimately decides the entrance exam.

So, what was the public opinion about the transition from private high school to special purpose high school?

According to a poll in October 2019, 54% agree and 36% disagree.

More than 10% of the opinion polls in November of the same year also indicated that they should be converted to general high schools.

However, the controversy over’Narrow Nambul’ is a burden.

The core criticism is that the two children of Seoul’s superintendent Cho Hee-yeon, who are promoting the abolition, have graduated from foreign high school, and that they have passed, so that they are trying to clear the ladder of rising status.

Inquiries were also followed at a hearing on candidates for the minister.

[권칠승 / 중소벤처기업부 장관 (당시 후보자, 지난 3일) : (특목고 폐지에 동의하십니까?) 동의합니다. (동의하는 데 딸은 보냈다, 그 말씀이죠?) 본인이 갔습니다. 제가 보낸 게 아닙니다. 본인이 갔습니다. 제가 우리 아이들을 특목고 보내기 위해서 과외를 하거나 학원을 보내거나 그러지 않았습니다.]

[황 희 / 문화체육관광부 장관 (당시 후보자, 지난 9일) : 사실은 저는 (자녀가) 자사고에 입학한 거는 몰랐는데요. 본인이 그래서 집 앞에 있는 (자사고인) 한가람고를 혹시 자기가 (원하는 외국인학교에) TO(자리)가 없어서 못 들어갈 것을 우려해서 자사고에 본인이 입시 응시를 한 겁니다.]

Of course, the opposition party is not free from this problem either.

In 2019, a problem arose about universities that selected many graduates from special high schools and autonomous private high schools at the time of’Jungkook of the Fatherland’, and the Democratic Party proposed a full-scale examination for entrance examinations for children of lawmakers.

The Liberal Korean Party, the Barunmirae Party, and the Justice Party all responded quickly, such as enacting special laws, but after that, it has naturally been absent.

This is because the Liberal Korean Party refused to link it with the state affairs investigation or to include not only members of the National Assembly but also high-ranking officials.

[나경원 / 당시 자유한국당 원내대표 (2019년 10월) : 지금 20대 국회의원 전수조사하는 것도 중요하지만, 사실 고위공직자 전수조사 말씀을 드렸습니다. 차후에 이런 일이 발생하지 않도록 하는 제도를 만드는 것이 더 중요하다는 생각도 같이 드리고요.]

Returning to this ruling, the court did not accept the claim that the law that regulated the abolition of private high schools until 2025]was’unconstitutional’.

As the Ministry of Education has announced its intention to pursue policies regardless of this ruling, it is predicted that the results of future elections will also be a significant variable as the judgment of the Constitutional Court and the grounds for abolition of private high schools are not in the form of a law but in the form of an’enforcement decree’.

Park Gwang-Ryeol [[email protected]]

.Source

Share this:

Related