[사건큐브] Court, Goo Hara’s mother, who did not raise 40% of inheritance… 60% father

Sending time2020-12-22 15:23

The late Goo Hara’s miscarriage has raised the question of whether people who have not cared for the family are entitled to inheritance.

The court decided that the rights of fathers raised by themselves should be recognized more than the mothers who did not care for Gu’s brothers and sisters.

Let’s take a look at the meaning of this ruling with Sohn Jeong-hye attorney and Choi Jin-bong, professor at Sungkonghoe University.

<질문 1> As the court decided the contribution of the Guhara family to 20%, the inheritance ratio became 6 to 4. How do you see the meaning of this ruling?

<질문 2> The mother’s mother left the house when she was 9 years old and then appeared after 20 years and asked for half the price for the sale of the real estate.

<질문 3> Gu’s family members are known to have been struggling with the appeal, although the ruling is more advanced than before.

<질문 4> Because of this, it is said that it is’advanced judgment’ than before, but Mr. Goo Hara’s lawyer insists, “Please pass the Goo Hara Act quickly, which deprives parents of the inheritance rights of parents who do not fulfill their duty of support.” Please explain what is the main point of the’Goo Hara Law’ and what it is in the National Assembly.

<질문 5> In the case of China, it is said that the case where the legal heir abandons the heir is the reason for disqualification under the inheritance law. What about foreign cases?

<질문 6> Mr. Koo said that if the victory is confirmed, he will create a foundation to help children in difficult situations. How will the trial proceed in the future? Even if the’Goo Hara Act’ is enacted, isn’t it impossible to apply retrospectively to this case?

Yonhap News TV article inquiries and reports: katok/line jebo23

Unauthorized reproduction-redistribution prohibited>
2020/12/22 15:23 sent