與 “Apart from the judge’s impeachment” 野 “Government loyalty”… Kim Myung-soo’s workshop on weekends

On the 6th, the ruling and opposition parties continued their premonition over the controversy over the’declaration of falsehood’ of Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo.

Senior Judge Im Seong-geun (left), Chief Justice of Kim Myung-soo. [연합뉴스]

Senior Judge Im Seong-geun (left), Chief Justice of Kim Myung-soo. [연합뉴스]

In addition, the Democratic Party is blocking the spread of controversy by criticizing Im Seong-geun, Vice President of the Busan High Court, as a “impersonal trick”, who transcribed the interview with Chief Justice Kim. Earlier on the 3rd, Chief Justice Kim said in an answer submitted to the National Assembly that “there was no fact that he said that the resignation cannot be accepted due to the issue of impeachment,” but the next day (4th), Chief Justice Lim said, “(The National Assembly) is installing to impeach, but if I accept the resignation, what will you hear from the National Assembly?”

Democratic Party spokesman Heo Young said at a briefing that day, “Judge Lim released the transcripts and the words and actions of Supreme Court Chief Kim deserve to be criticized, but attempts to obscure the nature of the impeachment prosecution are never acceptable.” Spokesman Huh emphasized that “the issue of Supreme Court Justice Kim’s conduct and the issue of impeachment against Judge Im are separate,” and emphasized, “The impersonal trick of recording cannot overcome the cause of impeachment for anti-Hub law.” At the same time, he said, “Stop using judicial reform as a political battle anymore” toward the people’s strength.

In a radio interview on the 5th, Democratic Party lawmaker Park Ju-min also said, “The dialogue between Deputy Chief Justice Lim and Supreme Court Chief Kim and the procedure for impeachment of the judges are completely separate.” Asked. It was read to the effect that Vice-President Lim induced Supreme Court Chief Kim’s remarks.

On the other hand, the power of the people continued criticism toward Chief Justice Kim by using harsh expressions such as “Blue House Loyalty” and “Trumpet Man”. In a commentary on the day, spokesman Kim Ye-ryeong said, “The Supreme Court Justice Kim filed a false answer to the National Assembly, claiming that there was no impeachment statement. In order not to undermine the honor of the judiciary and not to leave a stubborn appearance, the wise conclusion is “resignation.”

Spokesman Kim said, “In the transcript, there is a content that Supreme Court Chief Kim said,’I do not have the idea that the (judge) impeachment system is realistic.’ He said that he judged the impeachment, and criticized that he was “basically undermining the separation of powers and disqualifying the head of the judiciary.”

Reporter Sung Jiwon [email protected]


Source