尹 The Day of Destiny, a text invited by Myung-Soo Kim as the Blue House… “Misleading behavior”

President Moon Jae-in is wearing a mask after finishing his remarks at the'Five Factors Invitation Meeting' held at the Blue House on the morning of the 22nd.  The right is Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo.[연합뉴스]

President Moon Jae-in is wearing a mask after finishing his remarks at the’Five Factors Invitation Meeting’ held at the Blue House on the morning of the 22nd. The right is Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo.[연합뉴스]

On the day the Seoul Administrative Court decides whether to temporarily suspend the execution of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol’s “two months of honesty” disposition, criticism comes out for President Moon Jae-in’s invitation of Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo to the Blue House. The legal profession pointed out that the burden would be heavy as the court judges the prosecutor general’s honesty, which is the first in the history of the constitution.

On the morning of the 22nd, President Moon invited Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo and Constitutional Court Chief Yoo Nam-seok, and held a meeting with the Blue House. National Assembly Speaker Park Byung-seok, Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun, and Central Election Commission Chairman Roh Jeong-hee also attended. The Blue House explained that it was prepared to discuss the factors of Part 5 and how to overcome the corona crisis, and to exchange opinions on the overall state affairs issues.

“The President’s misleading behavior”

Unfortunately, however, it overlaps with the day of the Yun trial. The 12th administrative division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Deputy Judge Hong Soon-wook) will begin the first interrogation on the case of the request for suspension of execution for the disciplinary disposition of President Yun from 2 pm on the same day. The prospect is prevailing that the court will decide to dismiss or cite a citation within this week based on the results of the interrogation on the day.

It can also be problematic that President Moon is the party who finally approved Yoon’s two-month disciplinary action. President Moon came home on the afternoon of the 16th, the same day that the disciplinary committee announced the result of the decision of’two months of honesty’. “The defendant is the Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae and the target is the disposition of President Moon,” said Yoon’s lawyer Wan-gyu Lee, who filed a lawsuit for suspension and cancellation of the disciplinary action.

Frontline judges “very inappropriate”

President Moon Jae-in is speaking at the'Five Factors Invitation Meeting' held at the Blue House on the morning of the 22nd.  From left, Election Commissioner Roh Jeong-hee, President of the Constitutional Court Yoo Nam-seok, Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun, Kim Sang-jo, head of the policy office, Roh Young-min, chief of the National Assembly Speaker Park Byeong-seok, President Moon, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Kim Myung-soo. [연합뉴스]

President Moon Jae-in is speaking at the’Five Factors Invitation Meeting’ held at the Blue House on the morning of the 22nd. From left, Election Commissioner Roh Jeong-hee, President of the Constitutional Court Yoo Nam-seok, Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun, Kim Sang-jo, head of the policy office, Roh Young-min, chief of the National Assembly Speaker Park Byeong-seok, President Moon, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Kim Myung-soo. [연합뉴스]

Judges in the front line thought that the invitation could affect the proceedings of the trial in the future, even if the invitation did not immediately affect the outcome of the suspension. Even after the result of the suspension of execution, the first trial for cancellation of the suspension for two months remains, followed by the second and third trials. On the 4th, President Jae-do Yoon is in charge of a constitutional complaint and an application for a temporary injunction to suspend the effect, pointing out the unconstitutionality of the prosecution and disciplinary law, including the formation of a disciplinary committee led by the Minister of Justice. If the Constitution determines that the Prosecutor’s Disciplinary Act is unconstitutional, the results of the disciplinary committee held under the Prosecutor’s Disciplinary Act may also be nullified.

The deputy judge of the metropolitan area said, “It is a very inappropriate act to manage the judiciary within a typical bureaucratic system. It is correct that the president does not deliberately meet with the chief justice of the Supreme Court, the head of the Constitutional Court, and the incumbent chief justice (Chief Noh Jung-hee) before an important trial. The prosecutor in the province said, “On this day, an interrogation on the suspension of execution is held against President Yun, and the next day there is a sentence of first instance against Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, Dongyang University professor, the wife of the former Minister of Justice Cho Kook. Both the invited party and the party who responded to the invitation were misleading. He said.

Jung Yujin [email protected]


Source