Seoul Mayor by-election 野 Candidate TV debate
Controversy over’free meals’
Oh “I should spend it in a poorer house than in a richer budget”
viewer
On the 16th, candidate Oh Se-hoon and National Party candidate Ahn Cheol-soo exchanged the word of’free meals’ at the first TV debate on the 16th. Candidate Ahn said to Candidate Oh, “Do you still object to the “opposition to free meals”, which is called the political Achilles heel, as “the cause of the correction of Park Won-soon.” Candidate Oh said, “I feel unlimited responsibility for Park Won-soon’s municipal administration,” and “My political philosophy is that limited financial resources should be provided to children in need.”
Candidate Ahn told Candidate Oh at a TV debate that day, “This election is an election that requires 10 years to judge Park Won-soon (former Mayor of Seoul). Honestly, I have a responsibility to make concessions. Do you agree?” he asked. Candidate Oh said, “Yes. “I have apologized for several times,” and Ahn asked, “Do you still oppose free meals?”
Candidate Oh said, “It was against the free meals for the rich,” and said, “If you have the money to give to the children of the rich, the purpose is to achieve educational welfare by providing public education benefits such as support for after-school school or native English-speaking teachers to poor children.”
Candidate Ahn also said, “There was a communication problem with the Saenuri Party leadership (at the time of resignation). There is no law that this should not happen again.” Then he asked, “Do you admit the wrong judgment at that time?” Candidate Oh emphasized, “It is clear that it was unreasonable to get a job,” he said. “However, it was the first step in thinking that we should go to the class where the welfare to be used for the rich is difficult in that we create a ladder for class movement in order to spend the budget efficiently.” did.
/ Reporter Gyeo-woo Koo [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >