Support for’regular expansion’ to nurture private education.. 2025 High school credit system introduced, confusion expected
[베리타스알파=강태연 기자] Based on the measures to strengthen fairness, regular expansion continues in the 2021 High School Education Contributing University Support Project (hereinafter referred to as the Contributing University Project), starting from last year and entering the second year. Whether or not to select a contributing university project last year was determined by the 2022 regular rate of universities. Metropolitan universities had to increase the SAT-based admission rate to 30%, and local universities had to adjust the student sub-course (subject) or SAT-based admission rate to 30%. As the same conditions apply to the second year, 16 universities in Seoul (Konkuk University Kyunghee University, Korea University, Kwangwoon University, Dongguk University, Sogang University, Seoul National University, Seoul National University, Sungkyunkwan University, Sookmyung Women’s University, Soongsil University, Yonsei University, Chung-Ang University, Hanyang University, Hanyang University, Hanyang University), must expand the scheduled time by at least 40% by 2023. A project to support’high school education’ in the education world in response to a policy that continues to encourage regular expansion in a situation where the school class that had been based on public education collapsed due to the regular expansion, and the increase in N attendants/certification exams and the reinforcement of private education/special education zones appear. Some point out that this is not a’private education’ support project. This is because even if you look at the selection results of Seoul National University for the 2021 grade after the regular expansion, there was a weakness in general high schools and the strength of private education was clear at regular times. Some point out that it is contradictory to select based on on-time weight, in that most of the project cost is spent on personnel expenses for admission officers.
Experts say they are concerned about the confusion that will arise from the high school credit system, which predicts the full introduction in 2025. On February 17, the Ministry of Education announced the’Comprehensive High School Credit System Implementation Plan’. A professor was appointed. The fact that the evaluation index for the second year of the contributing university project is to be applied as it was last year means that the regular weight of 2022/2023 grades will be expanded as planned, and a full reorganization of college admissions for the high school credit system to be carried out afterwards has been confirmed. One education expert said, “It is a completely different story to convert the SAT to absolute evaluation in the existing academic type-centered college admission situation, and to convert the SAT to absolute evaluation in a situation where the president forced 40% of the top universities on time.” The confusion has been left to the consumers in that the demanders who are preparing for college are preparing for college in accordance with the regular expansion, and the university has to reverse the reversed college admissions game again.”
The contributing university project in 2021 will provide approximately 5,594 billion won to 75 universities. As this year is the second year of the 2020 project, the university to apply is decided through an interim evaluation and an additional selection evaluation. As universities that have been selected last year and received support can also be eliminated, the attention of the educational community and college students is focused. In 2020, an interim evaluation was conducted for participating universities, and higher-ranking universities will continue to apply as a second-year project, and if the score is less than the standard, the application will be discontinued or designated as a performance management university depending on the type. In the case of Type I, the application is discontinued and the opportunity to re-entry is given. In the case of Type II, the application continues, but it is designated as a performance management college. When designating a performance management university, the project cost in 2021 cannot exceed the project cost in 2020, and the amount of the reduction is determined by the Project General Committee.
In the case of last year, 67 Type I schools and 8 Type II schools were selected according to the regular rate. All 16 colleges requiring more than 40% of the on-time share by 2023 were also selected by expanding the 2022 on-time share to more than 30%. The biggest change in the contributing university project in 2020 is that the selection and evaluation index has changed drastically in order to connect with regular expansion. ‘School education-centered screening operation’ items related to class/subjects that were used as evaluation indicators in university-based college admissions have been deleted,’reinforcement of fairness in college admissions”simplification of college admissions and expansion of information disclosure”reinforcement of the social responsibility of the university’ It consists of three areas. It was pointed out that the name was the’high school education contributing university’ support project, as it changed the opposite direction to the existing direction that encouraged frequent expansion centered on the academic type.
<정시확대 기조 유지, ‘사교육 지원사업이냐'.. 서울 16개대학 2023대입 정시40% 예정>
Following last year, the focus of contributing university projects this year is to expand on time. It seems that the contributing university project is still being used as an induction plan for regular expansion. In accordance with the’Measures to Enhance Fairness of College Admission Systems’ announced in 2019, universities had to adjust the SAT-based admission rate to 30% in order to participate in the project last year, and 16 universities in Seoul had to increase the regular rate to 40% by the year 2023. You need to zoom in. The 16 universities are Konkuk University Kyunghee University Korea University Kwangwoon University Dongguk University Sogang University Seoul National University Seoul National University Seoul Women’s University Sungkyunkwan University Sookmyung Women’s University Soongsil University Yonsei University Chung-Ang University Hanyang University Hanyang University. Local universities should increase the rate of student-affiliated course selection or SAT-based admission to 30% by 2023.
Criticism is emerging that it is not a project to select and support universities that contribute to high school education, but to support’private education’. There is also a point that the regular admissions centered on the SAT is highly influenced by private education, but after the regular expansion, the number of consumers led to an increase in the number of N attendants/certificates and the reinforcement of private education/special education zones. Just by looking at the results of the scheduled selection for Seoul National University in 2021, it was possible to confirm the strength of N students and the increase in the number of students passing the GED, and in the recently released ‘2021 Seoul National University’s Top 50 Registration Results’, we could confirm the regular performance in the special education zone where private education is active. As a result of the expansion of the time period for reinforcing fairness, the result is that as a result, the consumer is driven to private education, including special education zones.
Last year, it was pointed out that when the criteria for selecting a contributing university project were announced, it was contradictory to use the subsidies for high school education contributing university projects, which are mostly used as personnel expenses for admission officers, as a means of pressure. This is because the direction of the project has been reversed as the project that has encouraged frequent expansion has been used as a means for regular expansion. Experts pointed out that linking the contributing university project with the expansion of the regular SAT-based admission rate is a measure that has lost the direction of the purpose of the project, contrary to the existing purpose. The contributing college project aims to reduce the burden of students/parents by simplifying the overly complex entrance examination system, and to improve the high school education, which is focused on memorizing knowledge, due to the college entrance system centered on the SAT scores, and to transform it into an education that develops creative/convergence thinking skills. to be.
While the previously conducted contributing university project was a project for frequent expansion centered on the academic type, the contributing university project conducted in 2020 was a project for linking with regular expansion. In the case of last year, items related to school type were deleted from the selection evaluation index, and evaluation areas were added for regular expansion. The’School education-centered screening operation’ item related to the existing school type/subject management was deleted, and it was designed into three areas:’Strengthening fairness for college admissions’,’Simplifying college admissions and expanding information disclosure’, and’Strengthening the social responsibility of the university’. The reorganized evaluation areas are ▲ reinforcement of fairness in college admissions (45 points) ▲ simplification of college admissions and expansion of information disclosure (25 points) ▲ reinforcement of the university’s social responsibility (20 points) ▲ business operation plan (10 points). ▲ Reinforcement of fairness in college admissions is △ Establishment of fairness foundation for college admissions (15 points) △ Enhancement of fairness in college admissions process (15 points) △ Securing admission officers and strengthening expertise (15 points) △ Whether or not a questionnaire within the scope of the high school curriculum for each university exam (- 15 to 0 points).
<2023학년까지 정시확대.. 2025 고교학점제 전면도입, 수요자 혼란 예상>
The problem is that it maintains the on-time expansion trend, which is reversed in that the situation that the full introduction of the high school credit system was announced in 2025. In 2019, in a word from the President, the situation that had expanded from time to time has been changed to the basis of regular expansion. The educational field, including the consumer, was confused, and the universities that were leading the school class, including Seoul National University, had no choice but to turn toward expanding the schedule. Under the contributing university project, universities are under pressure to expand on-time, and universities are in a situation where they have to re-establish a model in the context of regular expansion. In the case of consumers, confusion is expected to continue as they are preparing for college in line with the regular expansion trend that will continue until the 2023 grade.
It is difficult to believe the predicted change in college admission policy as it is. This is because it is questionable whether the’mid- to long-term plan’ including the introduction of the high school credit system to be carried out in the next regime is effective. It is difficult to predict how the education policy will be overturned in the future regime, as the current administration has set a precedent for overturning the university policy at the will of the president. Even the National Education Committee, which is currently under discussion for the establishment of a mid- to long-term plan for educational policy, has a structure that its members can be changed according to the president and other governments, so the effectiveness of the currently announced policies is doubtful.
<중간평가 75개교 실시.. 추가선정평가 6월 실시 예정>
Interim evaluation targets are 67 Type I schools and 8 Type II schools, for a total of 75 schools. The evaluation is divided into four groups considering the type/location/evaluation area, etc. Project performance is evaluated based on quantitative evaluation, and qualitative evaluation is conducted on college admissions execution plans and business plans. The data used in the evaluation are the operating results compared to the 2020 business plan, including the 2021 grade screening operation results, and the business operation plan for 2021. The content of the 2022/2023 college admission plan is also included in the evaluation. If the evaluation result is higher than the standard score, the second year of 2021 support will be provided. If it is less than the standard, type I is designated as an opportunity to discontinue application and re-entry, and type II is designated as a continuing application and performance management college. The interim evaluation conducted for the universities selected for the 2020 application project is scheduled to be conducted in April.
Intermediate evaluation target schools are ▲Type I (capital area) 30 schools, Catholic University Gangnam University Konkuk University Gyeonggi University Gyeongin National University Kyunghee University Korea University Kookmin University Dankook University Daejin University Dongguk University Myongji University Sangmyung University Sogang University Seoul National University Seoul National University Seoul National University Seoul National University Seoul Women’s University Sungkyunkwan University Sookmyung Women’s University Soongsil University Ajou University Yonha University Ewha Womans University Incheon University Hanyang University ▲ Type I (non-capital area) 37 schools, Gangneung-Wonju University Gangwon University Konkuk University (Glocal) Gyeongbuk National University Gyeongsang National University Gongju National University Gwangju National University Gwangju National University Gunsan National University Daegu National University Daegu University Daegu Haany University Dong-a University Dong-A University Dong-A University Pugyeong National University Busan Catholic University Busan National University Sunmun National University Sooncheonhyang University Andong National University Yeongnam National University Chosun University Jeonju National University School of Education Chungnam National University Chungbuk National University Korea National University of Education Korea Transportation University Hannam University Handong University Hallym University Hanbat University Hoseo University ▲ Type II 8 schools, Deokseok Women’s University Tea Medical School Hanyang University ERICA Catholic Kwandong University Daegu Catholic University Dongguk University (Gyeongju) Mokpo University Changwon University.
The additional selection evaluation, scheduled to be carried out in June of this year, will be conducted for universities with discontinued application and newly applied universities. The intermediate evaluation criteria are applied mutatis mutandis, but the final decision is made by the Project Management Committee in consideration of the current status of the applicant universities. The 2021 business operation plan and the 2022/2023 grade college admissions operation plan are evaluated, and whether or not to support the project is determined. Based on the results of the evaluation, the re-selection and additional selection of universities with discontinued application for Type I and new applicants are determined, and the reselected universities are designated as performance management universities.
<입시비리 수혜제한 강화.. 사업비 삭감/선정평가 감점 기준 강화>
The contents of the project evaluation also included reinforced restrictions on the beneficiary of irregularities for entrance examinations. In order to enhance the reliability of the university entrance examination operation and to strengthen the accountability of the university, the criteria for limiting beneficiaries due to admission fees will be reinforced. The criteria for limiting benefits due to irregularities in the entrance examination included cases in which major positions were taken or prosecuted due to irregularities at the university’s organizational level. The basic criteria for the scope of the beneficiary limitation are to follow the’Collaborative Operation/Management Manual for University Financial Support Projects’, but the reduction of project costs and deductions for selection evaluation have been reinforced when checking for irregularities in the entrance examination.
In the joint operation/management manual, the criteria for limiting the beneficiaries of the support project are applied to those classified into administrative/audit disposition, criminal judgment, and negative behavior at the entrance examination. By item ▲The administrative/audit disposition-related issues of disciplinary action will be reinforced by reducing the project cost and deducting points from the possibility of limiting beneficiaries at the existing discretion. The severe disciplinary issue is the same as the existing project cost cuts/cuts. ▲ Regarding the criminal judgment (determination of higher than the safeguard), the existing project cost will be reduced from 10% to 30% and the selection evaluation will be reduced by 4% to 8%, the project cost will be reduced by 20% to 30%, and the selection evaluation will be reduced by 6% to 8%. . Fairness verification, etc. ▲There was no separate regulation regarding negative behavior for entrance exams, but it will be reinforced with a reduction of less than 5% of the project cost and a deduction of less than 1% of the lower evaluation.
Copyright © Veritas Alpha Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited