Park Hye-soo’s denial of abuse and evidence photo again

Actor Park Hye-soo repeatedly denied that the words and actions of those who raised the suspicion of school violence were contradictory and called “false facts.” Earlier, after filing a complaint against those who mainly posted these false facts on the online community, he announced that he would also sue others who allege falsehoods to justify the false disclosures.

Park Hye-soo’s agency, Studio Santa Claus, issued a statement on the 4th, saying, “The claims of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s abuse are obviously false.” It contradicts,” he refuted.

He said, “As long as the allegation of abuse is false, the statements of those who meet it are also false,” he said. “We are revealing our position on Mr. A, the main claimant of disclosure.”

Earlier, Mr. A has been assaulted to become bloody several times, and Park Hye-soo, who called his father, has even revealed that he has swear words. It was also said that he was beaten by moving to a karaoke room, a second shopping mall, and a playground in the third apartment complex.

The agency responded to this, saying, “The many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the time of the assault that Mr. A allegedly did not contain any information that could infer this fact at least. He pointed out that he even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying,’Do not chew Hye-su’.”

In addition, “It is common for the victim, Mr. A, to send a text message to Park Hye-soo, the target of fear, to the extent that he assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody and participated in it several times, and he even called his father to swear words. It is hard to understand even with common sense,” he added.

In a media interview the day before, Mr. A explained that the photos taken with Park Hye-soo and karaoke in a friendly manner were disclosed as “the time of the assault was in 2010, and a photo in 2009, about a year ago.” This is the agency’s explanation. This photo was reported by Dispatch, an online entertainment newspaper, and in a related article, Park Hye-soo claimed that she had never participated in the assault, citing eyewitnesses.

Park Hye-soo’s agency also released a photo containing file information with the date of the shoot, saying, “This photo was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that is clearly confirmed through the details of the photo file.”

“As you can see from the previously reported article and witness testimony, Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and the shopping mall that the second assault was carried out does not exist on the scene. It’s a match” he insisted.

“In the light of the reported articles and the statements of related witnesses, it can be confirmed that Park Hye-soo has never been involved in any of the first and second incidents.” You can confirm that you are the third person, not Park Hye-soo.”

In addition, “This content is accurately mentioned in the interview on March 4, and clarifies that he is himself.” “Mr. A is constantly changing his arguments based on the facts revealed through media reports, etc. I doubt the credibility.”

In addition, “In fact, the content of the first damage claim was that Park Hye-soo was hit by the cheek, but afterwards, the level of the damage and the content of the claim changed from moment to moment with’group assault’ and’assault key’. “We are constantly changing the arguments in this way.”

Along with this, “We have already filed a complaint against major people who have posted false information, and the investigation is currently underway.” In addition, “we have submitted various evidence including evidence reported in the media to the investigative agency, and secured it. We will also submit additional evidence that there is.”

“In order to justify false disclosure, we plan to expand the scope of the complaint against others who are claiming false facts again.” In addition, “We ask again to refrain from reckless speculation and slander without a reasonable basis. “I appealed.

Earlier, on the 20th of last month, an online community posted an article stating that he was assaulted by Park Hye-soo while attending middle school, followed by a number of allegations of damage.

On the 22nd of last month, Park Hye-soo’s agency announced a legal response, saying that it was “false. The next day, he filed a complaint with the Seoul Yongsan Police Station, and on the 24th, he claimed that the self-proclaimed “Park Hye-soo Haunted Victims’ Meeting Room” had contacted them, refuting that there are circumstances to suspect their suspicion as a malicious joint act aimed at promoting economic profit. In response, Mr. A made an official position of the victims’ group to the Social Network Service (SNS) and confronted with, “The dozens of meeting rooms have never asked for money.” “What we want is Park Hye-soo’s sincere apology.”

In this month, even those who said they assaulted Mr. A along with Park Hye-soo at the time appeared.

Shin Jeong-in, online news reporter [email protected]

[ⓒ 세계일보 & Segye.com, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]