People’s Strength One-on-one discussion of candidates for the Busan mayor’s by-election
Debate Evaluation Team “Candidate Hyung-Jun Park debated well” Conclusion
The power of the people through the Busan Mayor’s main race candidates are taking commemorative photos before the start of the TV debate. Candidate Hyung-joon Park (left) and Candidate Eon-ju Lee (right). Provided by the power of the people, Busan City Party“alt=” Busan Cultural Broadcasting on the afternoon of the 15th
Busan Cultural Broadcasting on the afternoon of the 15th
“Is it true that Park Hyung-jun, an aide who was a member of the National Assembly, was helping in the current camp after receiving a bribe from a speculative company and receiving a prison sentence?” (Lee Eon-joo) Does it hurt your character? You will have to apologize later” (Hyungjun Park) “It’s true in the article, so answer me” (I) “I’m so sorry today. We have to discuss local issues, but in the end it became a personal attack.” (Park)
Dong-A University professor Park Hyung-joon and former lawmaker Lee Eon-ju, who had engaged in a’private life’, met again in a one-on-one debate on candidates for the Busan Mayor’s by-election on the 15th. When the two people who had solidified the second-class system had a slanderous battle with each other revealing the other’s self-confidence, the moderator intervened, saying, “Please ask only the current issues.” The choice of the debate evaluation team in the conflict returned to the victory of Park’s preliminary candidate. At the beginning, there was a battle over the political history. Preliminary candidate Lee Eon-ju opened the gun. Candidate Lee said, “I was in the Blue House for a long time during the MB regime. At that time, the MB regime pledged to a new airport for Gadeokdo Island and then destroyed it. At the time, the candidate took the lead in an interview with the media (about the new airport on Gadukdo Island), saying, “It is meaningful to change the wrong policy direction,” and rather persuaded the citizens of Busan.” Hyung-joon Park explained, “Since Gadeokdo was at a disadvantage compared to Miryang, it was better to take a long time to review it, so he delayed it.” Park also did not lose, and Lee’s’democratic party history’ was questioned. Candidate Park said, “It seems that the problem was that the MB regime was in real life, but in that context, did candidate Lee also take the lead in impeachment by doing twice as a lawmaker in the Democratic Party? Then, when criticized for contributing to the birth of the Moon Jae-in regime, would you agree?” Lee responded, “I thought that I should not create the Moon regime and ran out.” In addition, Candidate Park said, “Why did you come to Busan after serving as a member of the National Assembly twice in Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggi-do? When he criticized that he came to be elected in Busan, Lee said, “After leaving the Democratic Party, he abandoned all vested interests in Gwangmyeong. Busan was recommended by the Free Korean Party.” As we went to the second half of the debate, the mutual slander became more intense. Candidate Lee said, “When I was the 18th member of the National Assembly, I received 20 million won from the Screen Horse Riding Association owners’ meeting and went out to Las Vegas to watch a casino gambling game show. When he returned, he received a sponsorship of 100 million won, and in December of that year, despite the fact that the sea story caused a huge problem, it played a role in preventing regulatory reinforcement, and many people committed suicide and condemned.” Candidate Park said, “Candidate Lee is very misunderstood and misrepresents. If you do it wrong, it becomes a false fact. As a member of the opposition party, he was investigated, but he was not suspicious.” Eventually, when Candidate mentioned the issue of Park’s former aide, the battle became more harsh. When Candidate Lee raised his real name, “Is it true that an aide Park Hyeong-jun was helping in the current camp after receiving a bribe from a speculative company after receiving a bribe from a speculatory company?” You will have to apologize.” Accordingly, the moderator had to intervene several times and asked to “focus on the topic of’Pusan-related issues’.” At the end of the free discussion, Candidate Park said, “I am very sorry today. We have to discuss local issues, but in the end it became a venue for personal attacks,” he bowed his head. After watching the two candidates’ debate, the debate evaluation team selected Park as the’candidate who debated well’. After the debate was over, the’Discussion Evaluation Team’, consisting of 1000 members of the party and citizens, conducted an evaluation to select candidates who had good debate through an automatic response system (ARS) voting. Previously, the two candidates had a slanderous battle for privacy issues. However, on the 2nd, the Consular Commission of the People’s Power revealed that the verification result was’unfounded’ and asked to refrain from suspicion of’Kadeurasik without grounds’. By Jang Na-rae, staff reporter [email protected]