Former lawmaker Na Gyeong-won, who was running for the Seoul Mayor’s by-election, visited Namseong Sagye Market in Dongjak-gu, Seoul on the morning of the 5th and turned the battle over. Joint coverage photo
The power of the people who entered the main race, which was compressed to four, a nerve war between the candidates of the mayor of Seoul is fiercely unfolding on the 7th. ‘Na Gyeong-won (Na Gyeong-won + Huh Gyeong-eun) controversy’ was raised over the pledge to support real estate loans for Candidate Gyeong-won Na, who passed the preliminary contest in first place. The’Na Management Controversy’ was raised as Candidate Shin-Hwan Oh, who entered the main race of the mayor of Seoul, struck a direct hit on the 6th, saying,’Is it Na Kyung-won or Na management? He asked about the reality of the pledge in relation to the president of the National Revolutionary Party, Heo Kyung-young, who ran for the presidential election and pledged ‘100 million won in marriage allowance’. Candidate Oh said in the statement the day before, “Candidate Kyung-won Na made an improbable pledge. They said they would cut property tax, tax, and transfer tax, and at the same time provide 117 million won to newlyweds who marry and give birth to their first children. “Tax cuts and expenditures increase. Even if it is roughly calculated, how will you prepare a budget that will cost enough 5 trillion won?” He said, “I politely ask Candidate Kyung-won Na to take self-respect for improbable pledges.” Candidate Na held a press conference at the National Assembly on the 5th and said, “If you marry in Seoul and have children, you will receive a total of 117 million won in subsidies.” It was said that it would provide 45 million won for marriage and 45 million won for the birth of the first child, and the city would pay the interest on the loan for the purchase of a home for three years to achieve a’dream of getting a home’ with more than 100 million won. Candidate Oh criticized this pledge as “absurd pledge”. Then, Candidate Na directly refuted Candidate Oh’s issue that day. Candidate Na said on his Facebook page that day, “My pledge is a prepared pledge after accurate calculations, on-site policy model design, and analysis of financial conditions,” and “I pledged to build 10,000 public housing units a year. , “We will provide support for the initial loan interest for three years for young people and newlywed households residing in this public housing.” Candidate Na continued, “If 10,000 units are supplied each year, loan interest support will be fixed at 360 billion won per year from the fourth year.” “If less than one hundredth of Seoul’s total budget is not supported, Seoul’s housing welfare It’s like giving up at all.” Candidate Na then urged a classy criticism and aimed at Candidate Oh again. Candidate Na posted a separate post on Facebook that day, saying, “It is always welcome to publicly criticize and discuss my pledge, but as a political offensive to frame the pledge without looking at the details of the pledge because it is buried only in an attack for attack, The game does not change.” It refers to Candidate Oh, who chose’Seoul, Game Changer’ as the slogan. Candidate Na continued, “We should refrain from criticizing while criticizing. The point is good, but the mockery is not right.” He added, “I will keep the dignity and spirit of the original team in the remaining main race and in the process of unification.” By Noh Hyun-woong, staff reporter