[뉴스컬처 이이슬 기자] Actor Shin Hyun-joon from the rantThe former manager, who claimed to have suffered an unreasonable settlement, etc., refuted when he revealed that he had recently lifted the suspicion.
On the 22nd, former manager Kim said, “Shin Hyun-jun said that the prosecution had concluded the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the GapJil and the drug administration that he raised. It claims that the content of one disclosure is false, but it reveals that this is not true.”
Sap
Shin Hyun-jun/Photo = News 1
Mr. Kim said, “I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy against Shin Hyun-jun. Therefore, the argument of Shin Hyun-joon to the effect that the controversy over Gap-jil has turned out to be not true is not true.” Insisted.
He said, “The case that I asked for the investigation was whether the explanation of Hyun-Jun Shin, who said that he introduced the hospital to Hyun-Jun Shin, was false, even though he had never introduced the hospital that received the Propopul drug.” The investigative agency has only made a decision not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his own reputation.’
He said, “Currently, Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecution for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so I will inform you that he will disclose his position again after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.”
Kim, a former manager of Shin Hyun-jun, claimed that he had suffered from various kinds of goads including unfair treatment and overdue wages for 13 years in July of last year.Afterwards, Kim filed an accusation by revealing that Shin Hyun-joon had illegally administered Propofol 10 years ago. Accordingly, Shin Hyun-joon argued that “the allegations of propofol medication are also unfounded,” and refuted that “a matter that was discovered 10 years ago by the prosecution for legitimate treatment purposes and passed without a formal investigation at the time.”
In November of last year, Shin Hyun-joon was faced with no charges of prosecution. Through the legal representative Pyeongan Law Firm “The case where Mr. Kim sued me for reasons such as’Gap-jil’ was unconvicted by the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office on November 9,” he said. He said that he immediately rejected the complaint because he could not confirm any illegal facts about the case that accused him of “. In addition, he argued, “All of the contents exposed by Kim insisting on me, such as propofol and GapJil, are not true at all, and were revealed through investigation.” After godHyun Joon sued Kim for defamation.
The following is the full text of the official position of former manager Shin Hyun-jun.
1. I am Kim 00, who previously worked as a manager for actor Shin Hyun-jun. Recently, Shin Hyun-joon claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy and the drug administration controversy raised by him, and he argues that the contents of the disclosure he filed are false, but this is not true. .
① Regarding the controversy
I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy itself against Hyun-jun Shin. Therefore, Shin Hyun-jun’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-jun has been found to be untrue is not true.
However, I raised the issue as there were several false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-jun regarding the controversy about Gap-jil, but the investigative agency was not interviewed by Shin Hyun-jun, but others around him. The decision was made without charge because it was difficult to say that it was the content or that it was announced in the process of refuting the content of the interview, and that it was difficult to believe that it was intended to slander or defam the person.
② Proposal related
In the past, I have raised a problem related to Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of Propople, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.
However, separately from this, the case that I requested for an investigation was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propopul to Shin Hyun-jun, as if he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the investigative agency has only decided not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his honor.
2. Rather, after revealing that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed to Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. The person did not pay after he did not pay, or by stating that he had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment after recruiting investors under the pretense of being a manager of Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the prosecution recognized his claim as fact and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution as an opinion of insults. We inform you that a police investigation is ongoing
3. Currently, Mr. Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecutor for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so we will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.