The Economic Reform Association made a comment on the day and said, “According to the regulations on employment restrictions under the Act on Aggravated Punishment for Specific Economic Crimes, Vice-Chairman Lee is not allowed to serve at Samsung Electronics for five years even after July 2022, when the sentence was terminated.” When the ruling is finalized, the Ministry of Justice must immediately request the chairman of the Samsung Electronics board of directors to dismiss Lee.
In addition, the Solidarity for Economic Reform argued, “Considering that the Compliance Committee is not a legal body that has been given authority or responsibility under laws and regulations, it is very valid to conclude that it cannot be considered a favorable sentence for the defendants.” .
“It is in itself unfair to admit that the court may reflect’recovery judicial’ during the trial and reflect the compliance system as a’post-crime situation’ which is advantageous to management. The judiciary should deny the idea that it could be taken into account as a favorable norm for the head of the country.”
“Samsung Group should continue to supplement the compliance system, apart from this revocation and repatriation review,” he said. “By carefully reviewing the points pointed out as inadequacies in the evaluation of the expert hearing committee, a sustainable and effective compliance system was established. You have to build it.”
UPI News / Reporter Donghoon Yang [email protected]
[저작권자ⓒ UPI뉴스. 무단전재-재배포 금지]