Jaeyong Lee, imprisoned for 2 years and 6 months

Jaeyong Lee, imprisoned for 2 years and 6 months

by

Samsung Compliance Monitoring Committee “lack of effectiveness, not reflecting sentencing”
In 2008, 10 years after Chairman Lee Kun-hee faced a family arrest

김우찬 경제개혁연대 소장 겸 고려대학교 경영대학 교수는 이재용 삼성전자 부회장 파기환송심 공판이 진행 중이지만 재판이 마무리된 후 다시 삼성의 승계작업이 시작될 가능성을 언급했다. 사진=뉴스핌, 그래픽=김성화 기자<br />“src=”https://news.google.com/news/photo/202101/89634_58205_5539.jpg”/><figcaption>Vice Chairman Lee Jae-yong was jailed again in February 2018 after being sentenced to two years and six months in prison in the Gukjeong Nongdan case trial. Graphic = Reporter Seonghwa Kim</figcaption></figure> </div> <p>Top Daily Reporter Kim Seong-hwa = Samsung Electronics Vice Chairman Lee Jae-yong received a court ruling.</p> <p>On the 18th, the Seoul High Court sentenced Lee to two years and six months in prison. Vice-chairman Lee, who was arrested on February 17, 2017, was released on February 5, 2018, and was sentenced to one year and six months in prison.</p> <p>The court announced that the Samsung Compliance Committee, which has emerged as an issue, has not been reflected in the sentencing. “It is difficult to say that the criteria for effectiveness have been met,” the judge explained to the junta. “We have come to the conclusion that it is not appropriate to take into account the terms of the sentence in this case.”</p> <p>Previously, the judiciary was evaluated by former Constitutional Judge Kang Il-won (recommended by the court), accountant Hong Soon-tak (recommended by special prosecutors), and attorney Kim Kyung-soo (recommended by Vice-Chairman Lee) as a hearing committee member. As accountant Hong and attorney Kim’s opinions were mixed, former Constitutional Judge Kang admitted only the limited effect of the reserved position, so how the court would accept it emerged as the key.</p> <p>However, from the standpoint of the judiciary, the sentence was imprisoned but the sentence was reduced as much as possible. The Certain Economic Crimes Weighted Penalty Act required imprisonment for more than five years when the amount of embezzlement exceeds 5 billion won, but it can be commuted up to two years and six months at the discretion of the court.</p> <p>Like the previous Supreme Court ruling, the court bribeed a total of 8.6 billion won, including 3.6 billion won for horseback riding support, 3.4 billion won for horse-washing, and 1.6 billion won for the Winter Gifted Sports Center, which was given to Jeong Yu-ra, the daughter of Seo-won Choi (formerly Choi Soon-sil). Admitted.</p> <p>Prior to the revocation of the revocation, the second trial included the support for the Winter Sports Gifted Center of KRW 1.6 billion and the price of horse reeling of KRW 3.4 billion as a passive bribe under the pressure of former President Park Geun-hye.</p> <p>As a result, the Samsung Group faced the absence of the total for a year and a half after 10 years after Chairman Lee Kun-hee took responsibility for the investigation into a special prosecutor for borrowed accounts in April 2008, retired from management, and returned in 2010.</p> <p>As for Samsung, the number of cases in progress apart from this trial was numerous, and the situation in which the total number was absent was deepening. The Samsung Group is also in the process of a case involving the breakdown of the Samsung Electronics service union, the breakup of the Everland union, and a lawsuit on the price of the stock purchase right for the merger of Samsung Bio’s accounting and Samsung C&T.</p> <p>Regarding this ruling, Kim Woo-chan, director of the Solidarity for Economic Reform, said, “It is said that the juncture did not recognize the effectiveness of the junta and did not reflect it in the sentencing, but it was considerably reduced compared to the sentence of the Supreme Court.” It can be said that it is fortunate that the corporate governance structure has not been distracted to the extent that it leads to disruption.”</p> <hr/> <p><!-- 관련기사 //--></p> <article class=
Related Articles

Total number of 4 groups, 4 people, 4 colors New Year’s tasks

Samsung Electronics Vice Chairman Lee Jae-yong, how far is it recognized for involvement in management succession?

[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑫ Samsung C&T merger, what’s next
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑩ The ‘3·5′ rule of’genetic innocence’, a scenario came out
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑨ Was Elliott a’fuck’ or a’shareholder’ side?
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑧ Samsung C&T, KCC, and’traditional magic’
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑦ Samsung C&T merger’Pros’ National Pension, belated reflection
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑥ Samsung C&T merger’Unanimously’ Board of Directors, for whom
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]⑤ Unlisted Samba is more valuable than Samsung C&T
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]④ Samsung Public Welfare Foundation, take care of the public interest and private interest
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]③ Reason for choosing Samsung C&T over Lee Jae-yong
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]② Why you shouldn’t look ridiculous at Everland
[삼성, 이재용, 경영승계]① Structure of circular investment through Samsung Electronics

Copyright © Top Daily Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited

Source