[다주택자 양도세 완화 군불때는 당정]
■ To pull out the property…Expert diagnosis
10-20% tax cut is not effective
You need to give the signal,’You can buy a house anytime’
‘
viewer
“The tax levied on the real estate market right now is not heavy, but rather’heavy heavy’. If you want to ease the capital gains tax, there is no real benefit for multi-homed people if you cut it by 10-20%.” (Professor Shim Gyo-eon, Konkuk University)
Regarding the party administration’s review of the transfer tax of multi-homed people and easing measures, experts ordered that this opportunity should be taken to substantially lift regulations. This is because the government’s current supply and demand control card stimulates anxiety and encourages’panic buying’. He emphasized that the supply will overflow in the future by easing various regulations such as loans, redevelopment and reconstruction regulations, and that it is necessary to send a signal that a house can be purchased at any time using loans.
viewer
First of all, it is explained that the intensity of the easing of the transfer tax should be stronger in order for the sale to be released in the market. Professor Shim affirmed, “The degree of easing is much more important than the easing of the transfer tax itself.” “Currently, the gains on the transfer of expensive apartments are very high. Assuming that the gain from the transfer is 1 billion won, you have to pay 600 to 700 million won in tax.” “The situation that is handed down to you will not change.” In fact, the number of apartment donations last year recorded the largest ever. According to the Korea Real Estate Agency, the number of apartment donations nationwide from January to November recorded a total of 81,968.
In addition, experts emphasized that in order to silence the nation’s’fire market (fiery bull market)’, the layered regulations must also be significantly removed. It is because the government suppresses supply and demand at the same time, but rather, there is anxiety that the market cannot buy my house now or forever. Actually, public-led housing supply has clear limits. The reality is that repeated lending regulations are encouraging more panic buying.
Professor Shim said, “The problem that bothers the common people most is the cheonsei crisis. To solve this problem, reducing the demand for jeonse is one way. This is possible by turning the demand for jeonse into trading. He advised that the method is to loosen the regulation on loans to consumers who want to purchase real-life housing and to unconventionally lift the transfer tax for multi-homed people.
It is explained that the deregulation of maintenance business must also be accompanied. Mi-Hwa Lim, a professor of real estate at Jeonju University, emphasized the need for deregulation, saying, “The Seoul housing market is a structure in which the current supply and demand problems determine prices.” In addition, he emphasized that the policy to confine the real estate market, such as the obligation to live in, should be reviewed for effectiveness. Seo Jin-hyung, chairman of the Korean Real Estate Association, said, “We must review the 3rd Lease Protection Act from the beginning and provide benefits to rental housing operators so that the private sector can supply high-quality rental housing. We must be able to do it.” / Reporter Park Yoon-sun, [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >