[사회]Court suspends disciplinary action against Yoon Seok-yeol…

[앵커]

The court accepted the request for suspension of execution, which Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol appealed to the two-month disciplinary action.

After the last job suspension, President Yoon returned to work.

Let’s listen in detail by connecting reporters. Reporter Lim Seong-ho!

Following the last suspension of duty, the court has accepted Mr. Yoon’s request for suspension of disciplinary execution.

[앵커]

Yes, the Seoul Administrative Court said it was citing some of the two-month suspension of execution by President Yoon Seok-yeol.

It was decided to suspend the two-month effect of suspension until 30 days from the date of the judgment of the disciplinary cancellation lawsuit.

General Yoon’s reaction has not come out yet.

The Ministry of Justice also said it would check the court decision first, and said it has no other position at this time.

With this, Mr. Yoon was able to return to work once more following his last suspension of work.

The details will be understood only when the court decision comes out, but when the court cited some of the request for suspension of execution, it seems that first of all, it has acknowledged that Yun’s irreparable damage and the need to urgently prevent it.

The last time the suspension of office was suspended, the court judged that the suspension of President Yoon’s job had undermined the political independence and neutrality of the prosecution.

It is noteworthy whether the court that heard the suspension of disciplinary enforcement this time would have made the same judgment.

In particular, in this interrogation on suspension of execution, not only the requirements for suspension of execution but also the legitimacy of the discipline and the validity of the reasons were considered.

These are the issues that are usually controversial in the disciplinary revocation lawsuit.

However, this time, because it was the disciplinary committee and even the presidential residence, the court looked into the matter in depth.

For this reason, in the previous interrogations, whether the composition of the disciplinary committee of President Yun was legal on both sides, and what was the purpose of the analysis document of the court that caused the controversy of the’judgment inspection’?

In addition, we asked seven key questions, such as whether it is possible to initiate the prosecution without the approval of the Prosecutor General.

At the second interrogation this afternoon, we intensively listened to the answers.

The court decision made it impossible for the Ministry of Justice to avoid criticism that he pushed the punishment for Yoon’s hard work.

In addition, President Moon Jae-in, who reapproved, is expected to face the theory of responsibility.

This is YTN Seong-ho Lim from the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office.

※’Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]